Like Penelope’s shroud, the Odyssey has rested, barren and tight-strung, for the space of many
years. Beginning with Telemachus’ journey, Athena has been carefully tending to
her wool, deepening dyes and untying old knots and incipient tangles. From here
she takes up the wefting sword and plunges into the final work, finally shuttling
together the disparate threads of father, mother, and son.
There are two orders of business left before
all the characters can fulfill their role in this complicated plot. First, Odysseus must be transformed so that
he can enter
“ ‘Why not tell him the truth? You know it all.
Or is he too—like
father, like son—condemned
to hardship, roving over the barren salt sea
while strangers devour our livelihood right here?’” (B.13, 475-78)
Athena assures him by explaining her motives—that
Telemachus might get a decent airing out before battling the suitors—and rather
quickly skates over the fact that “True enough, / some young lords in a black
cutter lurk in ambush, / poised to kill the prince before he reaches home”
(B.13, 484-6) but dismisses it with a familiar generalization: “I have my doubts they will.” As usual she shows no interest in giving more
information than is absolutely necessary for her plans to move forward,
demanding a sort of general trust from her players. It is charming for Odysseus to interrogate
her, but she cannot be flustered into giving away more than an essential
minimum. This tendency towards being
tight-lipped serves three distinct purposes:
first of all, it simply saves time.
(She has already expended a good amount in her teasing with Odysseus,
but must be quite aware that her imposed limbo cannot hold for much
longer.) Secondarily, it maintains a
neat hierarchy between herself and the mortals in her charge, and they must
inevitably depend on her as a source of information. It is both unhealthy for mortals to be
overinformed, and, we can conclude, bad for business. Lastly, it forces the mortals to exert their
own powers of consideration in order to achieve their goals; and, in the case
of Telemachus or Penelope, takes them over a much rougher road from which they
emerge much more fit than they would have if they had been fully informed. Their efforts as a result make their reunion
with Odysseus a more fitting one, as we’ve already noted.
Having
dispensed all the information she is willing to give him, Athena transforms
Odysseus as promised. Where she usually
bestows Olympian makeovers, Odysseus gets the reverse treatment, emerging as a
grotesque old itinerant, complete with beggaring accessories. The rationale underlying this disguise is, as
usual, multi-layered. There is a
deliciously Athenaic irony[1] in
a glorious king returning as a shriveled beggar. Simultaneously, it is when Odysseus is in
this bedraggled state that he is at his most powerful in all of The Odyssey, with the full forces of
Pallas Athena at his disposal.
Next,
the disguise puts him at the apparent mercy of the various people whom he must
encounter (Athena used this tactic, although to a lesser extent, in using
Mentes as her first disguise). This
serves as an excellent tool to reveal their true character; they have nothing
to gain from him[2], and
furthermore even the servants can wield a distinct power over him. How he is subsequently treated is an
excellent indication, then, of who is worthy to be considered an ally. (Of course he is given further tips by the
likes of Eumaeus, but these tips come only by dint of Eumaeus’ demonstrated character.)
Lastly,
and most sinister of the three, it serves to stoke the fires of Odysseus’
anger. His own state echoes the state of
Athena
sends Odysseus off to the home of the swineherd Eumaeus. Although we learn that he is of noble birth
and was raised alongside Odysseus and his sister, his position places him
firmly among the other herders and servants—if not further down, given the
unpleasantness and difficulty of the task.
Athena’s purpose in sending Odysseus to this person in particular is not
difficult to discern—Eumaeus is openly loyal to the memory of his king, quite
honest about the situation at the palace (his description of Penelope’s
optimism is heartbreaking), and deeply charitable. He is also practical to the core, not
maintaining any illusions about the likelihood of Odysseus’ return, and
healthily skeptical of his visitor’s assertions to the contrary:
“Good news…but I will never pay a reward for that, old friend—
Odysseus, he’ll never come home again. Never…
Drink your wine, sit back, let’s talk of other things.
Don’t remind me of all this. The heart inside me
breaks when anyone mentions my dear master.” (B.14, 192-7)
When a man so demonstrably pragmatic as Eumaeus
expresses open grief, Odysseus can be certain that his presence is deeply
missed by the faithful. His concern for
Telemachus—and his winning description of the boy—also stockpiles Odysseus with
certainty about his son’s character and lineage.
“The gods reared him up like a fine young tree
and I often said, ‘In the ranks of men he’ll match his
father,
his own dear father—amazing in build and looks, that
boy!’” (B.14, 202-4)
Lastly,
he provides Odysseus with an opportunity to spin yet another fantastic yarn
about his invented past as a veteran of the Trojan War. All of this serves to agitate Eumaeus’
memories so deeply that, in spite of his disbelief, he begins to lean towards
hope that Odysseus might indeed someday return.
A
point of interest in The Odyssey is
the tendency of the narrative voice to refer to Eumaeus in a fond second
person, almost patting the character on the shoulder; this attitude of warm
trust adds to our impression of Eumaeus as the best possible person for Odysseus
to have sought out. He is a confidante,
a guide, a brother, and a loyal servant in one sturdy package.
While
Odysseus is getting settled in, Athena departs on her last cross-country jaunt,
this time to retrieve Telemachus from
Athena
rouses him with an odd piece of invective against Penelope:
“It’s wrong, Telemachus, wrong to rove so far,
so long from home, leaving your own holdings
unprotected…
…they’ll carve up all your wealth, devour it all,
and then your journey here will come to nothing.
Quickly, press Menelaus, lord of the warcry,
to speed you home at once, if you want to find
your irreproachable mother still inside your house…
She must not carry anything off against your will!
You know how the heart of a woman always works:
she likes to build the wealth of her new groom—
of the sons she bore, of her dear, departed husband,
not a memory of the dead, no questions asked.
So sail for home, I say!” (B.15, 16-27)
What’s the point of casting doubt over Penelope this
way? We can believe that the suitors
will take anything not nailed down, but Penelope seems to be beyond reasonable
reproach. Athena does acknowledge that
“even now her fathers and brothers urge Penelope to marry Eurymachus” (ibid), but this still seems
like a rather unfair tactic. We would
most likely prefer that Athena give Telemachus a hint as to Odysseus’ return,
or that she suggest that Penelope is facing some imminent threat—instead she is
urging him to rush home and change the combination on the family safe.
The
best possibility is that this is further encouragement to Telemachus to think
of the welfare of the throne as increasingly his own responsibility—not that of
Penelope, the palace elders, or his absent father. Penelope has held out as long as she can, and
now will have to act as a woman of
So
Athena has started to tear down the delicate house of cards which constituted
The
first encounter between Telemachus and his disguised father is another one of the
many sizing-up scenes that take place in the Odyssey, and the second for Odysseus in this disguise. Telemachus over the next few minutes has
ample opportunity to show his love for Eumaeus and his charitable respect for
the strange beggar, but it is when he begins to speak of the situation waiting
for him at the palace that Odysseus’ ears swivel and prick.
Telemachus
has gained a good deal of confidence and a sense of ownership over the
household, but he is still far from the complete package. Telemachus has no experience in battle: “I’m young myself,” he sighs, “I can hardly
trust my hands / to fight off any man who rises up against me.” (B.16, 80-1)
Odysseus grills him about his inaction, and Telemachus responds by
giving him an idea of just how many suitors there are to be considered. Eumaeus, as Athena suggested, is sent off to
inform Penelope—he is expressly kept from telling Laertes, to keep the news
from spreading too quickly—and father and son are finally left alone
together. One of the most elegant
passages between Athena and Odysseus occurs as a result:
“His exit did not escape Athena’s notice…
Just at the shelter’s door she stopped, visible to
Odysseus
But Telemachus could not see her, sense her there—
the gods don’t show themselves to every man alive.
Odysseus saw her, so did the dogs; no barking now,
they whimpered, cringing away in terror through the
yard.
She gave a sign with her brows, Odysseus caught it,
out of the lodge he went…and stood before the goddess.” (B.16, 180-6)
This is a lovely illustration of how little the two
characters require to communicate amongst themselves. The mention of the dogs is also
significant—they almost savaged Odysseus, the fawn around Telemachus, and now
they cringe in fear. Each reaction has a
useful connotation: Odysseus must beware
even of the animals in his old house. Telemachus is a young man capable of
inspiring loyalty. As for Athena, we—and
Odysseus, more importantly—are reminded that she is not merely a handy
consultant or a helpful patroness, but a direct embodiment of a truly awesome
power. Powers on this order, however much they can express fondness and
concern, are fundamentally dangerous.
Luckily for Odysseus the almost nuclear potency of Zeus’ third-born is
squared at the enemy camp, but the favor is not to be taken lightly. Her instructions to Odysseus are so fiercely
terse that they almost hum with anticipation:
“Royal son of Laertes, Odysseus, old campaigner,
now is the time, now tell your son the truth.
Hold nothing back, so the two of you can plot
the suitors’ doom and then set out for town.
I myself won’t lag behind you long—
I’m blazing for a battle!” (B.16, 188-93)
Odysseus, renewed with a glamour, wordlessly returns to
the lodge, and Athena goes her own way. A
tearful reunion follows: when the
disbelieving Telemachus mistakes Odysseus for a god, Odysseus quickly denies
it—“No other Odysseus will ever return to you”— attributes everything to
“Athena’s work, the Fighter’s Queen,” and after a lightning fast recap of his
Phaeacian journey, he further notes that “Athena’s inspiration spurred me here,
now, / so we could plan the slaughter of our foes.” (B.16, 263-4) Credit carefully given.
The
two embark on a brisk brainstorm session, with Telemachus providing information
and Odysseus formulating tactics. What’s
most interesting about this planning session is that Odysseus himself
formulates all the main elements of their attack—not Athena. She expressly leaves the two to their own
devices (“so the two of you can plot / the suitors’ doom”), giving only a
general promise of her powerful presence[3]. Odysseus nevertheless feels very comfortable
attributing likely actions of support to Athena—“When Athena, Queen of Tactics,
tells me it is time, / I’ll give you a nod”, “Then Athena , / Zeus in his
wisdom—they will daze the suitors’ wits” (B.16, 314-5, 330-1). In short, Athena is the sheer firepower that
enables their victory to be even vaguely possible, but they themselves are
expected to provide the direction and effort necessary to employ that
power.
Once
inside the household, Athena effects a series of small tweaks to keep up the
momentum towards the final battle. She
startles the suitors by revealing Odysseus’ sheer strength before the betting
bout with Irus, and his easy victory (along with their nervous desire not to
provoke his anger) induces an oily flood of praise. Odysseus in turn unleashes a rebuke against
the suitor Amphinomus, who walks away from the rather unnerving encounter
“his heart sick with anguish, shaking his head,
fraught with grave forebodings…
but not even so could he escape his fate.
Even then Athena had bound him fast to death
At the hands of Prince Telemachus and his spear.” (B.18, 174-179
This is one of a long, increasing grim series of
reminders from the narrator that Athena has it in for each and every one of the
suitors. It’s another bit of destiny
hopscotch: Amphinomus’ death, and the
method of his death, are absolutely certain—but the exact moments and events
which will lead to Telemachus actually throwing his spear is indefinite (or, at
least, in mortal hands).
While
the men are getting the more obvious attentions from Athena, Penelope is still
a critical point of interest. While
Athena is busy shoving the men towards self-determined boldness, she prefers to
coax Penelope down quiet corridors of action:
“But now the goddess Athena with her glinting eyes
inspired Penelope, Icarius’ daughter, wary, poised,
to display herself to her suitors, fan their hearts,
inflame them more, and make her even more esteemed
by her husband and her son than she had been before.” (B.18, 181-5)
Here Penelope is displaying her craft in such a way as
to make it clear that her intent is aimed at benefiting the household, not her
future husband: after tapping them for
gifts and several lustful compliments, she turns the tables and rebukes the
suitors for their greed, much as Odysseus did with Eurymachus. Witnessing this masterful display,
“Staunch Odysseus glowed with joy to hear all this—
his wife’s trickery luring gifts from her suitors now,
enchanting their hearts with suave seductive words
but all the while with something else in mind.” (B.18, 316-9)
Telemachus, too, reestablishes contact with his mother
during her visit downstairs, the two of them quietly exchanging hopes that the
suitors will soon be “battered senseless, heads lolling, knees unstrung”. Although almost subconscious, even at this
point there is a feeling of a family plan, extending not just between Telemachus
and his father, but Penelope as well. As
we soon see, Penelope has also been hatching independent plans, under the
sanction of Athena: the contest of
axes. This plan will fit seamlessly into
that of Odysseus and Telemachus, simultaneously reinforcing Telemachus’ growing
potential and providing Odysseus with his most deadly weapon along with another
key to his old identity. Athena is
clearly aware of all of the plans now under formation by her mortal cohorts,
and works to weave them together into a single surge of action.
Not
all of her actions, though, are so pleasantly helpful. One of the hallmarks of the two-act scene in
the palace is a nauseating atmosphere of dread, a weird hint of gore and
cruelty already hanging in the air above the banquet table. It is almost expressly produced by Athena
herself. Odysseus’ pitiful disguise
first of all inspires the cruelty of the suitors, and Penelope’s fan dance
arouses their lust—both of these are courtesy Athena. Beyond even this, though, Athena sees fit to
twist the dials, ratcheting them up to increasingly demented levels of
inhumanity:
“But Athena had no mind to let the brazen suitors
hold back now from their heart-rending insults—
she meant to make the anguish cut still deeper
into the core of Laertes’ son Odysseus.” (B.18, 391-4)
This passage is repeated several times, with various
suitors doing the honors. Again, it’s
easy to recoil from this tactic as sadistic, as if Odysseus were a fighting
cock jabbed and beaten by its keeper before being thrown into the pen. Instead it should be looked at as an
extension of her methods of interrogation:
in that case she withholds information until the subject gives her their
maximum and most genuine response (note that she is not lying, but withholding),
and in this one she baits the enemy, who in turn drives the subject to their
greatest possible level of aggression.
She is not “lying” about the nature of the suitors, either: she is driving them into their most essential
nature, and they in turn do the same for Odysseus. It is not enough for Odysseus to be cunning and
exercise his planning skills. For
victory, Athena requires him to be possessed with the godlike hatred which
gripped his fellows on the fields of
Telemachus
shoos out the suitors, startling them with his newfound forthrightness—he’s
even so forward as to peg their hot-headedness on “some god.” With them dismissed, the gears of action
again whirl into motion. Another
haunting moment of presence occurs as Telemachus and Odysseus drag the weapons
to the storeroom in anticipation of the fight:
“Pallas Athena strode before them,
lifting a golden lamp that cast a dazzling radiance
round about.
‘Father,’ Telemachus suddenly burst out to Odysseus,
‘oh what a marvel fills my eyes! Look, look there—
all the sides of the hall, the handsome crossbeams…
…all glow in my eyes like flaming fire!
Surely a god is here—
one of those who rule the vaulting skies!’
‘Quiet,’ his father, the old soldier warned him.
‘Get a grip on yourself.
No more questions now.
It’s just the way of the gods who rule
The fact that Odysseus is given the epithet “old
soldier” here explains the nature of his response properly enough: now is no longer the time for gawking or reveling
in the support of the goddess, but to stick to plan and accept what aid occurs
as it occurs This echoes the often repeated statement that one must take
whatever the gods dish out—in this case, tacit help. Odysseus gets into trouble when he later forgets
his own maxim and hollers at Athena for help in the final battle, an act which
nets him a very snappish reply.
Although
this beautiful little passage serves as an object lesson for Telemachus, and a
nice opportunity for fatherly injunction, it’s also a recurrence of the leading
goddess image. Like everything else in
these scenes, it is amplified: by the
presence of two generations of followers, and the literal illumination that
Athena lends to the world around them.
This
work accomplished, Telemachus is sent to bed, and Odysseus goes to speak with
Penelope according to her invitation.
One of the great debates involving their scenes together is, of course,
whether or not Penelope has yet recognized her husband. Athena gives us a nice indication that, in
this scene at least, she does not have a conscious certainty that the beggar is
indeed Odysseus. We can very well
suspect that she suspects it—even
Eurykleia, doing a good impression of Helen, loudly notes how much resemblance
he bears to her old master. But when
Eurykleia discovers Odysseus’ scar, Athena steps in:
“[Eurykleia] glanced at Penelope, keen to signal her
that here was her own dear husband, here and now,
but she could not catch the glance, she took no heed,
Athena turned her attention elsewhere.” (B.19, 539-42)
Athena acts this way for a specific reason: to delay Penelope’s recognition so that it
can occur on Odysseus’ terms. This
should confirm for us the fact that Penelope does not yet openly recognize her
husband—it’s unlikely that Athena would expend energy suppressing a knowledge
which already exists. Instead, as with
the plans for conquering the suitors, Athena makes certain that the exact
layout of future actions will be up to the mortal parties most in
question. Odysseus will consciously and
willingly give himself away to Penelope, and Penelope will consciously and
willingly acknowledge him as Odysseus.
Husband and wife are well-matched in their desire for control over their
own judgments, and Athena respects this by making sure the field is clear
before they engage each other. Penelope
does not need to completely recognize her husband to be most helpful to her
husband’s plan at this moment—her personal plans, which she discloses to him in
this scene, are enough to move action forward at the pace Odysseus
desires. He learns about the contest of
the axes, and he confirms that his wife’s longing for him is real. The contest also assures that she will not
wed anybody who is not explicitly Odysseus’ equal in at least one respect—and,
if none of the suitors are equal to the task, it is another brilliant stalling
measure, designed to hold them off with their own shame.
That
night is the last which the suitors will enjoy alive, and Zeus and Athena begin
to compile a long list of menacing omens for the benefit of Odysseus. Lying awake in bed, he expresses his worried
concerns to himself once more: even if
he defeats the suitors—“thanks to you and Zeus”, he will have to confront their
avengers. Athena responds with her usual
playful irritation:
“ ‘Impossible man!’
Athena bantered, the goddess’ eyes ablaze.
‘Others are quick to trust a weaker comrade,
some poor mortal, far less cunning than I.
But I am a goddess, look, the very one who
guards you in all your trials to the last.” (B.20, 46-51)
Despite this friendly reassurance, he remains uncertain
of his odds, perhaps due to some continuing uncertainty about Athena’s
reliability. Odysseus below hears
Penelope’s tears—“deep in his heart it seemed / she stood beside him, knew him,
now, at last…” (B.20 104-5), and prays for an omen from Zeus. This is met with a clap of thunder and a
well-timed curse from a servant-woman, and Odysseus’ confidence is fulfilled. Is this second-guessing Athena? If we look at Athena as a secondary aspect of
Zeus, it doesn’t seem unreasonable for Odysseus to seek confirmation from the
very origin of Athena’s power and authority.
As much as Athena enjoys the spotlight of her own actions, they are
performed under Zeus’ consent, and as an agent of Zeus’ will: in the last confrontation between Odysseus
and the avenging relatives, Athena calls on Zeus to provide the fireworks
necessary to convince the population that peace is the divine will. Athena is an advocate, but Zeus is the judge. The desire for verification from the highest
order of power is justified both on a personal and a professional level.
Athena,
however, is still the go-to goddess for the upcoming plan of action, and she
contributes mightily to the increasingly morbid atmosphere. The next omen is of her own making, and
represents the peak of the pre-slaughter spookiness redolent in the great hall.
After several more bouts of meandering cruelty, Telemachus once more announces
that he supports his mother’s remarriage, but refuses to drive her out:
“So he vowed
and Athena set off uncontrollable laughter in the
suitors,
crazed them out of their minds—mad, hysterical laughter
seemed to break from the jaws of strangers, not their
own,
and the meat they were eating oozed red with blood—
tears flooded their eyes, hearts possessed by grief.”
(B.20, 384-9)
The prophet Theoclymenus can easily guess what all this
foretells, and the suitors break the spell by turning their laughter towards
him; when he departs, they set upon Telemachus with an almost manic
intensity.
What’s
the point of all this ominous grandstanding?
We’ve already suggested that it’s simply a vehicle for exposing the most
essential nature of the suitors. Modern
readers are likely tempted to label all this as Athena giving the suitors a
last chance to catch on and high-tail it back to the safety of their own
homes. But we also know that, with
absolute certainty, she has doomed them all.
Crawling through the snarls and tangles of the Odyssey’s system of destiny, we can suppose that the suitors are
being given a chance to acquit themselves as best as possible before their doom;
the fact that they universally fail the test operates as an inarguable proof
that their nasty end is well-deserved.
This is situation where cause and effect are inextricable the one from
the other.
With this accomplished, the machine can be set
into motion. Athena inspires Penelope to
set the axes. Telemachus tries his hand
at the great weapon, and we’re treated to the knowledge that he has the power necessary
to string it—and, eventually at least, string it. Odysseus waves him off, and Telemachus goes
on to theatrically bemoan his “weakness.”
Nevertheless, this the last step in Telemachus’ specific
maturation. He is capable of fighting in
battle, and of wielding his father’s weapon.
For all serious purposes, this incident concludes Telemachus’ arc in the
story—he will assist his father over the next two books, but he is never again
the focus of a concerned attention, nor are his abilities called into
question. Telemachus has, through the
attentions of both Athena and his parents, passed as far into manhood as can be
hoped for a young man with a father still in his prime. He voluntarily cedes the bow, willing to wait
his turn to be man of the house, and through the hands of the suitors, it
arrives at those of his father.
This
causes the predictable ruckus. Penelope
goes on to defend Odysseus in his turn at the bow, and after this elegant
intercession she is sent back to her rooms (by an increasingly calm and
authoritative Telemachus), and Athena sedates her for the length of the
battle. Odysseus gains control of the
bow:
“Now he held
the bow
in his own hands, turning it over, tip to tip,
testing it, this way, that way…fearing worms
had bored through the weapons’ horn with the master gone
abroad.”
As usual, Odysseus is satisfied to reclaim something
only once he is given the chance to examine it himself, with carefully probing
hands. His first shot sends the arrow
humming through the axes. He rips away
his rags, and the second shot slays Antinous:
he screams doom down on the suitors (“you dogs! You never imagined I’d return from
On
Phaeacia Odysseus regained his name and his past, his ability to live among
men; with Athena he has regained his
trust in the gods. With Eumaeus he regained his loyal subordinates, and with
Telemachus he reclaimed his fatherhood.
Now in the hall, bow sound in his hand, he retrieves his identity as a
fighter and as the owner of the household.
All that remains is to reclaim his wife (his partner), his father (his
legacy), and his throne (his life’s occupation). To get to these he must first pass through
the suitors.
The
fight, however well-planned, is still overwhelming: the suitors retrieve their weapons, and the
motley four-person party find themselves facing a crowd of enemies. Athena at last enters the chaotic scene:
“Now Zeus’ daughter Athena,
taking the build and voice of
and Odysseus, thrilled to see her, cried out,
‘Rescue us,
…So he cried
yet knew in his bones it was Athena, Driver of Armies.”
(B.22, 214-20)
The suitors for their part immediately issue a long and
vicious series of threats against the disguised goddess. It’s not at them but at Odysseus that Athena
directs her disgust:
“Naked threats—and Athena hit new heights of rage,
she lashed out at Odysseus now with blazing accusations:
‘Where’s it gone, Odysseus—your power, your fighting
heart?
…you who seized the broad streets of
with your fine strategic stroke! How can you—
now you’ve returned to your own house, your own wealth—
bewail the loss of your combat strength in a war with suitors?”
(B.22, 234-43)
The suitors are doomed—this is an absolute certainty when
both she and her father are bent on the same end—so venting fury against them
is a rather useless redundancy. The
suitors have always been obstacles, worthy of little consideration beyond
simple tactical considerations. As
obstacles, though, they are also opportunities and tools: for Odysseus and all his extended allies to
show themselves worthy of the support the gods have provided them, to reclaim
what was once theirs, or achieve what they had not before. A good track coach will spend her time yelling
at the runners who trip, not the hurdles that trip them. However, Athena is nothing if not fair, and
as usual steps in to improve the circumstances under which Odysseus and his
band are attempting to prove themselves.
From her perch on the rafters—a very appropriate image for the goddess
of tactical surveillance—she makes certain that the salvos of the enemies fly
wide. This allows Odysseus’ crew to go
on the offensive, finally reaching the suitors in hand-to-hand combat. Telemachus and Eumaeus both receive
scratches, which operate as proof that Athena is not gifting them with
invulnerability, or lending them any greater skill with the blade than what
they naturally possess. Athena nexts
brandishes her “man-destroying shield of thunder” and drives the suitors
back—“like herds stampeding”[4]—and
the last of the enemies are cut down.
The only
two members of the household who are spared are Medon the herald and Phemius
the bard. It’s difficult not to notice
that these are two word-bearers, gifted speakers and crafters of fame. As such they must have an especial value to
Odysseus, and to Athena as well: it
takes only a single intercession by Telemachus for Odysseus to decide on
sparing their lives. Neither he nor his
patroness is of the type to pass up free publicity.
[1] If we
consider irony to be a sort of balance-play, in which circumstances relate to
their beginnings in a morbidly appropriate fashion.
[2] Except
Penelope, of course, who thinks he might bear her some relevant information
about Odysseus; her character is nevertheless just as clearly revealed by her
interactions with him, as we’ll soon see.
[3] Athena
always leaves Odysseus alone when he is in the process of reuniting with
somebody: Eumaeus, Telemachus, Penelope,
and Laertes. She wastes no time in
returning once the moment has passed.
[4] Just
another one of an impressive collection of cattle metaphors in the story, many
of them morbid. The cattle of Helios
continue to moo as they’re being devoured by Odysseus’ men, the meat on the
suitors’ plate begins to ooze blood…there’s an obvious connection here to the
role of cattle as one of the choice animals for sacrifice, but with a shade of
human identification. This would seem to
be supported by the tradition in classical mythology of gods and humans in the
shape of bulls or cows (Zeus wooing Europa, the girl Io, Pasiphae…). The battle here is referred to as a
“feast”—and the suitors are, apparently, the main course.